I Sample has been uncontaminated in situ
II No daughter products were initially present
III No changes in decay rate have occurred
IV Sample has not been subjected to environmental factors
(e.g. cosmic rays, nearby radioactivity, or chemical contamination)
V There have been no changes in atmospheric shielding
VI There has been no change in the Van Allen belt
VII The clock of radioactive decay started at zero
In the explosion of the big bang, Newton’s laws of motion should prevent any delta vector of the trajectory of the cosmic effluga. So Dark Matter is theorized in order to provide the necessary seeds of change in motion required to stimulate aggregation. Black holes can be detected by gravitational lensing, this is similar to the effect seen during an eclipse of the sun and the corona of the sun is visible around the moon. Starlight can be seen around dark objects of high gravity. This footprint of a black hole is not as we might think, the gravity of the black hole bending the light around it, but the mass of the black hole bends space so that a straight line between stars behind the black hole intersects the earth. Instead of the star, the earth and the black hole all being on a straight line, space itself is curved in the presence of the black hole in such a manner so as to curve that line enough that the star which is behind the black hole can be observed as if in a corona. Astrophysicists have created a map of the pattern of intergalactic space. Now is that a guess or have they created this map by observations of gravitational lensing? Without dark matter, the big bang would produce an ever expanding sphere of particles. Dark matter is theorized in order to fill the requirements of matter in the universe required by the big bang theory. What is the percentage of population III stars in the universe? Is the universe old enough for population III stars to have exploded? Would creating the universe with the appearance of age be considered a lie? Ferrell (insert reference) claims that there have not been enough hypersupernovae to have produced the heavier elements, but he is only counting observed supernovae denying any unobserved supernovae. He also makes much ado about no heavier elements than helium in novae but at the same time touting the existence of heavier elements in population II stars. Also stellar evolution is argued against by the presence of heavier elements in intergalactic space. (?) or nebular gas (?) What does spectroscopic analysis of the crab nebula? The background radiation of the big bang is omni-directional and homogenous or at least nearly uniform whereas it should be traveling in all directions away from the location of the big bang explosion. Doppler Effect of extra-solar light and the entire universe is moving away from not the location of the big bang but from the earth. Some stars or quasi-stellar objects are moving too fast for theory to explain, so dark energy is the supposition that provides the extra speed. The warp of space in the presence of mass would decrease the energy of light passing through that warp creating an illusion of red shift. Entropy would also redshift light. The Doppler shift of train whistles is observable at a distance from the tracks, redshift in a star’s light does not necessarily mean travel away from us, and it could mean travel perpendicular to our direction of observation.
No comments:
Post a Comment