Search This Blog

03 June, 2014

The epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Romans


The epistle of Paul the apostle to the Romans

Romans 1:19-20

“Because what can be known of God is clear to their inner moral sense; for in this way God Himself has shown it to them. For ever since the creation of the world, His invisible characteristics – have been made intelligible and clearly visible by His works. So they are without excuse . . . (Williams’s translation) . . . yet He didn’t fail to give evidence of Himself by doing good, giving you rains from heaven and crops in their seasons filling you with food and happiness. (Beck)

Psalm 106:20, “They exchanged their glorious god for the image of a bull which eats grass.  They forgot the God who saved them.”

 

If we compare the sixteenth chapter to the narrative in the nineteenth and twentieth chapters of Acts, we find that Paul was staying with Gaius in whose house the church of Corinth met.  Paul also mentions Eratus, the commissioner of public works at Corinth. (Dummelow, 1936)  Eratus and Timothy preceded Paul into Macedonia right before the riot in Ephesus.  Paul includes a recommendation for Phoebe who was from the Corinth area.  The records in Acts and the internal evidence indicate that the letter was written in Corinth.  The writing of this epistle demonstrates a familiarity with all parts of the Old Testament and assumes the same of the audience.

This epistle has an unusual salutation.  It is much longer than most.  Paul gives extra attention to describing Jesus and the gospel in the opening paragraph.  He explains that this gospel was predicted long ago in the Old Testament.  The salutation to this epistle is not characteristic, like the epistle to the Colossians; Paul is writing to people that he has not yet met.  Unlike the Colossians, where Paul had sent Epaphras to bring the gospel to Colossae, Paul did not control the message that was preached.  So Paul includes a mini-creed in the opening along with an announcement of his calling.  Paul describes the gospel that he is called to preach as being foretold in the Hebrew Scriptures.

Next, he describes the subject of that gospel, namely the person and work of Christ.  Wasting no time, Paul dives right in with a description of the dual natures of Christ, Christ’s human nature as having been descended from King David.  Christ’s divine nature was declared to be by the Holy Spirit in His resurrection from the dead to be the powerful Son of God.  Paul claims that his obligation to preach this gospel of the union of God and man in Christ, by the grace of Christ.  The purpose of Paul’s commission is to bring about the obedience to faith of all the nations.  This obedience will bring about conditions so that people will glorify God.  Paul makes a prayer of thanksgiving for the scope of the Christian testimony of the Romans.  And he prays that God would allow Paul to travel to Rome.  In this matter, Paul prays constantly because he wants to bring them a spiritual gift that will strengthen them and as he tells the Romans that they will encourage each other’s faith.  And anticipates that he might enjoy the results of doing gospel work amongst them.  Paul feels obligation to the Gentiles, since he enjoys the blessings of the gospel, he must share it with those who are without.  Because the gospel contains the method whereby people can achieve right standing before God, it is of the greatest import to people with a need to address God.  This method reveals the way of faith that leads to greater faith Habakkuk 2:5 reveals God’s righteousness as being both by and for faith.  “See the enemy is puffed up; his desires are not upright, but the righteous person will live by his faithfulness.” NIV Another way to look at this verse is by faith you will be righteous, and live.  The wrath of God comes down from Heaven against godlessness and wickedness because God is a God of truth, and in being wicked, people hide God’s truth under a cover of unrighteousness.  As is said in the Q’uran, in Al-Baqarah:

“And if ye are in doubt as to what we have revealed from time to time to our servant, then produce a surah like there and call your witnesses (if there are any) besides Allah, if your doubts are true certainly . . .” (4:14) and again “and cover not the truth when ye know what it is.” (5:42).

 Paul explains the reason for this wrath.  It is because people naturally know that because there is a creation, there must be a creator.  The power and nature of that Creator can be inferred both from that creation and from its nature.  Since the evidence of creation is readily apparent, ignorance is no excuse.

Therefore, the ancients, who had reason to know God, did not honor God with gratitude for life, but turned aside to senseless speculations and exchanged the glory of God for representations of what God had made, and exchanged the natural God-given wisdom for the foolish notion that the God of creation was a bird, or a crocodile or a cow.  Trading in the reality of God for the lie of worshipping the creation instead of the creator, they disapproved of acknowledging God; God gave up on them.  God allowed their minds to become depraved; they had become fools with senseless speculations, so God allowed their foolish hearts to become darkened; their thoughts turned to worthless things and they turned to every sort of depravity and wickedness that their degrading passions would lead them.

In the second chapter, Paul lays the foundation for the universality of sin by exposing the hypocritical nature of human judgment and the disparity between human and Divine judgment.  The perfection of Divine judgment brings both condemnation and approval.  This Divine judgment transcends the distinction of the possession of the Law of Moses.  In verse 11, “for there is no partiality with God.”  NIV.  There is sin and righteousness both within and apart from the law.  It is the inward nature of the person that makes the distinction; the circumcision of the heart.

Chapter 2: hypocrisy is bad. M’kay. Don’t do hypocrisy.  Psalm 62:11-12 “One thing God has spoken.  Two things I have heard: Power belongs to you God and with you Lord, is unfailing Love; and you reward everyone according to what they have done.” NIV Proverbs 24:11-12 “rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter.  If you say but we know nothing about this, does not He who weighs your heart perceive it?  Does He who guards your life know it?  Will He not repay everyone according to what they have done?” (Israel’s righteous among the nations) The benefits of circumcision extend only to those who keep the Law of Moses in every respect.  The value in having been a Jew was possession of the word of God, but the benefit of circumcision is for spiritual circumcision only.  If the Jews violated the covenant, does that mean that God breaks the contract too when He does not honor its provisions for those who break it?  No, because a broken contract is no longer mutually enforceable.  If a Landlord fails to maintain a residence in livable conditions, the tenant has the right to withhold the rent until such time as the landlord abides by the contract.  If a tenant fails to pay rent, the landlord has the right to declare the contract null and void and evict.  The righteousness of God is not highlighted by contrast with the wrong doing of humankind.  The kind of righteousness of which Paul writes is a metaphor from legal terminology.  It refers to standing to wit:  a hypocrite trying to enforce a contract that they themselves have broken has no standing.  A landlord who sues for eviction for non-payment of rent on a residence that the landlord failed to maintain in livable conditions such as no provision for heat, lack of access, or a leaky roof is either going to have their case dismissed or be ruled against summarily.  (Likely the judge will explain to that landlord that it is to their advantage to withdraw their suit and forfeit their court costs.)  In order to have standing in a tort case, one must demonstrate damages.  Standing, in this instance is a legal term indicating having an interest in the issue before the court, having a right to be in the court as an officer or as a friend called from the Latin amicus curiae of the court, or having the right to pursue an issue before the court.  The next theory of sin is sin as a broken fellowship with God and redemption as atonement, not the repayment of a debt.  Paul again indicates the origin of sin through Adam but gives no modus for the transmission from Adam to everyone.  That death came to everyone due to the fact of universal sin.  Paul then contrasts sin with grace.

In the third chapter, Paul declares the universality of sin as fact.  He does not attempt to prove or explain it.  He expects this to be self-evident.  Does this contribute an argument for the theory of sin as privation?  There are those who argue that without a doctrine of a sin nature, the universality of sin is indemonstrable, but I say that a fallen nature of sin removes free will and therefore accountability.  If we are incapable of righteousness because Adam sinned then sin is not sin and there is no such thing as moral agency.  If there is no such thing as free choice, no possibility of human righteousness, then Friedrich Nietzsche was correct when he said,” there are no moral phenomena at all, only moral interpretation of phenomena.”  The argument that as potential souls in the semen of Adam, we agreed in Adam to sin is just too silly for a response.  If sin is an inborn trait, it is not a choice.  Furthermore if sin is an acquired characteristic, then our greatest argument against evolution is exploded. If acquired characteristics can be inherited, then Natural Selection is true.  And Levi did not pay tithes to Melchezidek either Hebrews 7:9 is merely a statement of the primacy of Abraham over Levi as his ancestor.  The doctrine of original sin is not necessary to account for the universality of sin because the universality of sin is fact.  Indeed, since moral agency is dependent upon free will, the Divine foreknowledge of sin is not the foreordination of sin, else sin is not sin and Christ died in vain.  There must be the possibility of human righteousness in order for sin to be imputed.  Yet the fact remains in verse 23, “all fall short of the glory of God.”  Which of course, is true because if we did not fall short, we would be God and not human.

The word for sin in the Koine Greek is harmartia which is missing the mark.  Everyone has diverted energy from going the distance to selfish pursuits.  Charles Grandison Finney taught that all sin is some form of selfishness.  If there is an inborn sin nature it is our helplessness as infants which programs our minds to think of self first.  The fact simply is that when the time comes to break the pattern, no one does, except our Lord Jesus Christ.  Since righteousness is Divine righteousness, that is, perfection, anyone not limitless, not perfect, not divine is not righteous and in need of imputed righteousness by faith through grace.

In chapter four, the faith of Abraham was credited to his account as righteousness Here we encounter a different theory of sin, that sin creates a debt that must be repaid; a fiduciary theory of sin.  But still the concept of privation remains.  This debt concept introduces the concept of earning the means to repay or justification by works.  To which Paul responds that wages are not a gift and that Abraham was given a gift of justification by pointing out that righteousness was credited to his account before he was circumcised.  Again sin is described in financial terms.  But what was the faith for which Abraham was credited?  James says that Abraham believed God when he took Isaac up to Mount Moriah to be sacrificed.  Was that not an act? A work?  Abraham’s faith counted for righteousness.  In the matter of the sacrifice of Isaac on Mt. Moriah, God was testing Abraham, God foreknew the outcome.  Abraham was testing God.  Abraham’s faith was evident when he said to Isaac, “God will provide the sacrifice.”  Abraham’s righteousness was not part of the covenant; it preceded it and was the foundation for the covenant.

Since we have been given standing before God, we are happy when we suffer, because suffering leads to endurance.  The one who has endurance will develop a character that is tested and proven.  Endurance brings strength with it.  Because we are strong we have hope for a positive outcome to the application of our strength.  In our experience, strength brings accomplishment.  This hope that is built upon accomplishment, proven strength, tested character, patience, perseverance and tribulation does not disappoint.  We are not disappointed in our hope because it has this solid foundation and is not built on empty air, but on propitiation by faith.

In the fifth chapter, Paul cites Adam’s sin as the beginning of death in the world; and Christ’s act of righteousness in the crucifixion as the source of God’s grace coming into the world.  In contrast, Paul compares how much greater is grace and life for many people than sin and death for all.  In verse 9 of the fifth chapter, we are justified by the blood of Christ; we are reconciled to God by his death.  When we come into the court we have a right to be there as an amicus curiae (friend of the court) our standing allows us to achieve a ruling that we are not subject to the wrath of God.  In verse 13, where there is no law sin is not counted.  Paul contrasts Adam and Christ.  Paul proclaims that Adam was an antitype of Jesus, they both stand at the head of their race; they both stand at tipping points in history; Adam as the source of sin, death, and separation from God, and Jesus as the source of grace.  Here we see the judicial theory of sin in that judgment came upon the human race as Adam was representing all of us when he became our sin on the cross.

In chapter six, no one should say that we should sin all the more so that grace might increase.  Because when we become one with Jesus, immersed into His spirit, we are also on the cross with Him in death.  In His death, our propensity toward sin as habitual behavior died with Him.  We have, in His death, an escape from the habitual practice of sin.  In His resurrection from death, we are baptized into His life, resurrected into a rebirth, into a propensity toward righteousness, and the capacity to practice righteousness to a habitual behavior.  Perhaps it was a confusion of the baptism into Jesus in His death and resurrection that induced the early church into postponing their baptism until later in life so that an inadvertent sin might not spoil their post-baptismal life in Christ.  This is where Paul begins His argument that without the resurrection, the crucifixion is meaningless.  It is the resurrection that demonstrates God’s acceptance of the propitiatory sacrifice of the crucifixion.  Without the resurrection Jesus does not take His own blood to the celestial temple to put on the horns of the altar.  That with the sign and seal of God’s approval, hope in Christ is signified.  Furthermore, it was Christ’s claim to have the power both to lay down His life AND to pick it back up again that is His unequivocal claim to full Divinity.  It is the resurrection therefore that He is fully God and thus an efficacious sacrifice.  Paul uses the institution of slavery as a metaphor for the dedication of the individual to a life style; a lifestyle of sin or a lifestyle of righteousness.

In the seventh chapter, Paul’s next metaphor is that of a widow.  The death of the husband releases the widow from commitment and frees her from any condemnation in a second marriage.  Just as we died to sin in Jesus, so also we died to the law and because of that death we may forsake sin and the law and proceed in a relationship; a relationship with Jesus the one whose death in which we participate gave us the freedom from marriage to sin.

The law was a signpost to sin both for good and for ill.  The law pointed out sin that it may be avoided, but it also called attention to sin – Paul describes the human condition in the rest of the seventh chapter and that the limitation of that condition creates the sinful nature, but again Paul needs no traduction of sin from Adam to us nor any agreement in Adam’s sin by our potential souls in Adam’s body to account for the universality of sin.  It simply is.  Furthermore this doctrine that the soul of the child is in the male gamete is an insult to the humanity of women.  Isn’t it bad enough that Adam blames his sin on Eve, that the consequences of sin only fall on humankind through the sin of Adam but in addition to that in order to explain sin and exonerate ourselves we must also tell women that they have no part in the generation of the immaterial nature, the higher nature of the child that she nourishes and carries in her own body with her own person.  Remember, man was the prototype, woman, the finished product.  The 46th chromosome in man is incomplete, but perfected in woman.  God’s work in creation is praised for its mathematical precision and elegance.  The geometry of man is cylindrical; it is a product of p.  The geometry of woman involves conic sections, a higher order of math.  The formulae of conic sections involve square products.  Conic sections also describe trajectories.  The geometry of women is also the geometry of a body in motion; a body that is interacting with its environment.

Woman was not created from man’s foot for man to exalt themselves upon the backs of womankind is wrong.  Woman was created from man’s rib, so that they may stand side by side in mutual embrace.  A suitable helpmeet means a worthy partner.  In the book of genesis, after creating man, God creates all the animals and brings them to Adam for naming, but none of them were found to be a suitable partner for man, God, in acknowledgement of man’s need for partnership, created eve custom made to be the partner whose partnership brings God’s perfection to mankind.  God could have chosen to become human with a body created by spontaneous generation.  But God chose to honor women by being born of a woman; the ultimate praise.  Jesus, at the garden of Gethsemane, did not want to be crucified, but He was obedient to the death of a slave on our behalf.  At the wedding at Cana, Jesus did not want to change water into wine, because the time was not right.  It was not part of the plan of salvation.  Unlike healing the sick, opening the eyes of the blind, healing the crippled to walk, changing water to wine was not foretold by scripture.  So why did Jesus do it?  In obedience to His mother, He needed no other reason than His mother’s wish.  He changed the water to wine to honor His mother.  How dare we disrespect that which God honors; womankind?

Chapter seven concludes with Paul’s declaration of the mind as the arena for the struggle for dedication to God’s law.  On this occasion, Paul is perhaps not speaking of propitiation, but the fulfillment of the law; because the power of the Spirit frees us from sin and death which the law does not do.  Nope! Next verse speaks of Christ’s sacrifice for sin that frees us from the law.  Through Christ, we have died to both sin and the law so that we might live in the Spirit.  Paul speaks of full adoption into son and heirship in Christ through future glorification and redemption of our bodies.

The eighth chapter begins with the statement that the union with Christ removes the possibility of condemnation.  This is because Christ’s sacrifice met the righteous requirements of the law. Paul makes quotes Psalms 44:2 indicating that we suffer for the sake of God, but God gives us overwhelming victory and through His love. He indicates that this is our hope since justification we have already have for as in verse 24, “who hopes for what they already have?” NIV Paul also indicates that life in the Spirit involves God’s perfect knowledge of our minds and hearts and a communion in prayer between our spirits, God’s Spirit and God.  And that this intercession includes Christ in His official capacity as Glory at the right hand of God and that the resurrection frees us from condemnation. I Corinthians 2:10-12 “For God unveiled them to us through His Spirit for the Spirit by searching discoveries everything, even the deepest truths about God, for what man can understand his own inner thoughts except by his own spirit within him? Just so no one but the Spirit of God can understand the thoughts of God.  Now we have not received the Spirit that belongs to the world, but the spirit that comes from God.  That we might get an insight into the blessings in our weakness, because we don’t know how we should pray, but the Spirit Himself pleads with unspeakable yearnings, and He who searches our hearts knows what the spirit thinks, for He pleads for His people in accordance with God’s will.”

In verse 25, through the rest of the chapter, Paul describes the loving-kindness with which God cares for us; How God’s serendipity takes situations and makes the best of them.  In this, God has chosen us to be made like Jesus.  Since the ways of the flesh, that is the way of the natural man – the person without Christ is against the ways of the Holy Spirit.  We do not hanker after the things of the world, but the things of the spirit.  We are in the realm of the Spirit, we live in the Spirit, and we follow the Spirit who makes His home within us with Jesus.  Having died both to sin and the Law, we live according to the Spirit.  Paul speaks of the full adoption into the heirship in Christ.  Since we are adopted as the heirs of God, God grants us anything because He has given us everything in Jesus, God stands for us.  With God for us, no one can oppose us; no one can condemn us; no one and nothing can separate us from God’s love.  Some say that we ourselves can do so.  But what does Romans 8:35-39 actually say? I think that if we separate ourselves from fellowship with God, we have still not separated ourselves form the love of God.  Our heirship with Jesus extends to our eventual glorification and redemption of our mortal bodies.  Paul also indicates that life in the Spirit involves God’s perfect gifts to us are freedom from condemnation.

The ninth chapter is a theodicy, which is a defense of the sovereignty of God.  The occasion of this defense is Paul’s sorrow that his fellow Jews do not receive the sonship and blessings of God because they reject Jesus.  But in this rejection by some Jews, God’s promise has not failed.  Because God chose Isaac, not Ishmael and God chose Jacob not Esau.  God has chosen Jacob while the twins were yet unborn.  God tells Moses that God will dispense mercy and pity according to His own choice.  And God chose to inspire resistance in Pharaoh to further His own purposes.  Is God unfair in the choices He makes?  We cannot say, God is the potter, we are the clay.  God does not choose arbitrarily.  In verse 11 Paul states that God is accomplishing a purpose in His choices.  From the perspective of the clay, with limited perception, sensation, and cognition, how can we measure the choices and decisions that God makes from a perspective that is limitless in scope, perception, sensation, cognition, discernment, and so on?  Paul describes the knowledge and choices of God as not being from the limited nature of material existence.

Chapter 10 Paul indicates his sympathy and empathy for the Jews.  Verse 4 Jesus is the culmination and end of the Law in order that righteousness by faith becomes available.  Jesus is right here with us, we have no need for someone to travel long distances in order to bring Jesus to us, and Jesus and His word are in our hearts and on our lips.  In verse 9, Paul separates justification from salvation and continues the image of heart and lips saying with the mouth confess to receive salvation and with the heart believe to justification.  Paul ascribes justification to belief in the heart and salvation to the work of confessing with the mouth.

In chapter 11 Paul continues to explain the role of the Jews in the new covenant and uses a metaphor of pruning and grafting a cultivated olive tree and in verse 29 he declares that the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.  Paul explains the like the time of Elijah, God has not abandoned Israel, no Israel entirely abandoned God.  So the gentile Christians have no reason to boast or become puffed up with pride because  the Jews were removed from the promise in order to make room for them since that removal resulted in blessing, the return of the Jews will bring about even more blessing.

The section of the twelfth through fourteenth chapters show the convergence between the values of Paul and Christ.  The 12th chapter begins with a description of true and proper worship which is the service to God in our everyday lives: eating healthy and exercising to enhance the temple of the Holy Spirit, making every step when we walk a moving prayer; making every moment a gift to God according to God’s grace; and according to His gifts to us.  Our individual gifts fit together to complete God’s church according to God’s plan, some serve, teach, encourage, manage, share, and help the needy.  Together all these people doing all these activities in cheer and enthusiasm to complete God’s work.  Paul encourages the Romans to support each other in respect and love; to be happy with each other, to be patient with each other.  The kindness shown to strangers and enemies will lead to the conquest of evil because revenge is the Lord’s business not ours.

The thirteenth chapter of Romans begins with Paul’s defense of the civilian government and its place in the hierarchy of the Divine Moral Government of the universe.  Verse 4, a sword is not normally used to administer a spanking.  Paul exhorts the Romans to be only under the obligation to love; he echoes the words of Jesus that in loving one’s neighbor as oneself, that one will naturally follow the law because love offers no harm.  Paul says that the time is short and we should act as if our behavior was under the scrutiny of the light of day.

Chapter 14:  The details of your walk with Jesus do not matter as long as your focus is on Jesus, if you are focusing on someone else’s walk, whether you judge or criticize, your focus is no longer on Jesus.  Furthermore, Paul in verse seven foretells Donne’s dictum, “No man is an island”.  And as Christ is the lord of all of us, the living and the dead we should not judge each other because Christ will judge us all.  In the things that we do we are in interaction with Jesus whether we live or die, it is in Jesus.  In view of this, we should help and not hinder each other in living for the Lord.  There is no moral agency, praiseworthiness, or blameworthiness in things as in the things that we eat.  The good or evil in things is what we do with them; do we eat to the glory of God?  Do we eat to the glory of self?  Do we eat in excess or deficiency?  Either of these is not eating to the glory of God.  Neither is eating something that will cause another to stumble in their walk with the Lord.  We no longer have the issue of meat offered to idols, but the principle remains the same.  Be certain of your principles without doubt and follow them before the Lord.  If your practices without misgivings then they are lawful, if they do not arise from faith, then they are sin.  In some manuscripts, the closing doxology appears here.

In the fifteenth chapter, Paul continues this theme of enjoining the Christians who are strong enough to bear with those who are weak to help them in their Christian walk.  Toward this end, the scriptures were written so that we might use them to learn.  Not only that, but in the scriptures, we will come to a place where we can value our spiritual hope all the more.  And part of helping each other grow, is having accepted each other into harmonious association.  Jesus had become the proof of God’s truthfulness by being the servant of Israel to the fulfillment of the promises that God gave to the patriarchs.  As well as the gentiles enter into the promise, they become both praise to God, and the occasion for God to be praised and the people praising God, and Jesus becomes the hope of the gentiles.  Jesus, this God of hope, Paul prays will fill the Roman Christians with happiness and peace by and through their having continuing faith and belief that trusts God, so that the Holy Spirit in power will give more hope than they can contain.  Paul then expresses his confidence that the Romans can teach each other by their goodness and knowledge, so he only adds a few minor points with boldness.  He does this because of his special mission to bring the gospel to the gentiles.  This mission and the details of its history are his glory, his offering to God and the glory of God by signs and wonders.  Paul expresses his desire to push back the frontier of the gospel and not reiterate someone else’s work so he wants to come to Rome on his way to Spain after having delivered the Greek relief fund to the hungry of Judea from a famine (and incipient communism).  Paul begs for the support of their prayer in this endeavor.  Some manuscripts place the closing doxology here.

The sixteenth chapter contains personal greetings and a long list of personal introductions.  Finally, Paul warns to avoid people who with smooth talk and flattery deceive people and cause hindrances that oppose the gospel that they already possess.  Paul then concludes with glory to God who makes us strong by the gospel which is the revelation of ancient mysteries that were prophesied of old in scriptures that brings gentiles into obedience by faith.  The 20th verse of this chapter sounds like an ending it is the third such false ending.  Part of this is natural variance between manscripts.  Since this letter was dictated to secretary, (v22) preachers the use of the phrase “and in conclusion” is absolutely meaningless.


Bibliography

 

Holy Bible, 1979

The Church of Latter Day Saints

Intellectual Reserve Inc.

Salt Lake City, UT

 

The Four Translations New Testament 1966

World Wide Publications

Minneapolis Minnesota

 

The Holy Bible New International Version, 2001

Colorado Springs, Co.

 

The Holy Qu’ran 2000

Wordsworth Ed.

Herfordshire, UK

 

Dummelow, J.R. Reverend, M.A. 1936

The One Volume Bible Commentary

Macmillian Publishing Co.

New York

No comments:

Post a Comment